The readahead time should be interesting for latency vs. underruns
(which idiot protocols like HLS suffer from).
The total byte usage is less interesting than I hoped; maybe the
frequency at which it samples should be reduced. (Kind of dumb - you
want high frequency for the readahead field, but much lower for byte
usage.)
Of course, the code was copy&pasted from the DS ratio/jitter stuff. Some
of the choices may not make any sense for the new code.
wm4
f5d6edd4a2